By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Barnard | Law Firm
  • Latest News
  • About Barnard
    • About US
    • Our Services
    • Our Team
  • Calculators
    • Transfer Costs
    • Bond Costs
    • Bond Repayments
  • Contact
Reading: Can I withhold maintenance if I’m denied contact with my child? Understanding your rights and remedies
Aa
Barnard | Law Firm
  • Latest Articles
  • About Us
  • Our Services
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
© Barnard Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Family LawNews and Insights

Can I withhold maintenance if I’m denied contact with my child? Understanding your rights and remedies

By Isabel van den Ende 2 Min Read
Share

In many cases, disputes arise when one parent withholds contact between the minor children and the other parent. The natural reaction might be to withhold maintenance in response, but it’s important to understand that these two aspects – contact and maintenance – are treated separately under the law.

Can I refuse to pay maintenance if I am refused contact with my minor children?

The short answer is no. Maintenance and contact pertaining to minor children are two separate aspects of the Children’s Act. Every parent is obliged to pay maintenance to their children. If you are not in a position to pay the maintenance amount that was included in a Court order, you can approach the maintenance Court and request a reduction in the maintenance amount due to a change in circumstances and/or financial position. But, in the same instance, every parent also has the right to contact with his/her minor children.

What are my remedies when I am deprived of contact with my minor children?

Depending on the facts of your case, there are several remedies at your disposal. One of these remedies is to approach the Children’s Court to request the Court to grant you with contact with the minor children. The Court will consider your unique set of facts and make an appropriate order.

Since the Children’s Act specifically requests that a non-confrontational approach be followed, we almost always first opt to send an amicable letter to the opponent wherein we request that contact (and/or the status quo) be reinstated. Sometimes, this is a helpful first step to follow and the parties can reach a settlement without having to approach the Court. Alternatively, if this fails, we assist parties to approach the relevant Court and attach a copy of the letter proving that a non-confrontational approach was first followed and unfortunately failed.

By Isabel van den Ende | Senior Associate

Isabel van den Ende 13th August 2024
Share this Article
Facebook LinkedIn Email Copy Link Print
By Isabel van den Ende
Follow:
Senior Associate

Discuss this article with me:

Ad image

You Might Also Like

The Blame Game: Who Pays When Products Fail?

11 Min Read

Clause for Concern: Understanding the Risks in Legal Agreements

6 Min Read

How Courts in South Africa Decide on Placement for Vulnerable Children

4 Min Read

Does a ‘Father’ have a Right to Demand a Paternity Test?

4 Min Read
Tree White

© Barnard Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Barnard is a Level 2 BEE contributor
  • Privacy Policy
  • Careers
  • Law Students
  • Fidelity Fund Certificates
  • Testimonials
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?