By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Barnard | Law Firm
  • Latest News
  • About Barnard
    • About US
    • Our Services
    • Our Team
  • Calculators
    • Transfer Costs
    • Bond Costs
    • Bond Repayments
  • Contact
Reading: Locking in Certainty: Why Sophisticated Creditors Prefer Guarantees over Suretyships
Aa
Barnard | Law Firm
  • Latest Articles
  • About Us
  • Our Services
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
Follow US
© Barnard Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.
Barnard BriefsCommercial LawNews and Insights

Locking in Certainty: Why Sophisticated Creditors Prefer Guarantees over Suretyships

By Anneke Lötter 4 Min Read
Share

Credit heads and in-house counsel often default to “surety/guarantee” language in facility letters, assuming the two offer equal comfort. They do not. In high-value corporate lending and trade credit, insisting on a stand-alone guarantee – rather than an accessory suretyship – gives the creditor tighter control, faster recovery, and stronger balance-sheet optics. Here’s why your security package should start with guarantees.

Independence Equals Insolvency Immunity

FeatureSuretyGuarantee
Link to principal debtAccessory: rises and falls with the debtorAutonomous: survives liquidation, deregistration, or business-rescue moratoria
Defences availableMirrors every defence the debtor can raiseLimited to fraud or non-compliance with demand formalities

If the borrower enters business rescue or liquidation, a creditor holding only suretyships is forced into the same procedural queue as everyone else. A guarantor, by contrast, remains fully liable on first demand – keeping your recovery timeline in your hands, not the practitioner’s.

Speed of Enforcement – Cash-Flow Certainty

  •  • On-demand (also called “callable”) guarantees require no prior judgment or exhaustive proof of default.
  •  • Courts treat them like documentary credits: if the formal demand meets the wording, the guarantor must pay – often within days.
  •  • Suretyships usually trigger litigation before execution, delaying recovery and raising legal costs.

Board-level benefit: Predictable enforcement windows improve cash-flow modelling and reduce provisioning for doubtful debts.

Clean Disclosure and Covenant Hygiene

Large corporates increasingly report contingent liabilities under IFRS. Guarantees, being independent, can be quantified and ring-fenced; suretyships, with their derivative nature, create “grey” exposures tied to another entity’s financial health. Clearer disclosure:

  •  • Strengthens lender confidence in group financials.
  •  • Reduces covenant complexity in syndicated borrowing bases.
  •  • Facilitates securitisation or asset-backed funding that demands granular collateral mapping.

Negotiation Leverage with Counterparties

When you deliver an autonomous guarantee:

  •  • Suppliers may extend longer terms or higher limits.
  •  • Financiers can price facilities more competitively, recognising the lower enforcement risk.
  •  • Joint-venture partners perceive the commitment as skin-in-the-game, easing transaction friction.

5 Practical Drafting Tips for Credit Teams

  1. 1. Label isn’t enough—substance rules. Ensure the clauses state an “independent, primary, unconditional obligation” payable “notwithstanding any defence” of the debtor.
  2. 2. Include a “pay now, argue later” mechanic. Limit the guarantor’s right to raise disputes before payment.
  3. 3. Cap exposure, set expiry. A well-defined maximum liability or sunset date keeps risk committees comfortable without weakening effectiveness.
  4. 4. Mind regulatory caps. Banks and specialised lenders must align guarantee wording with the Banks Act and SARB prudential requirements.
  5. 5. Keep the surety – just in case. A twin-track package (guarantee plus suretyship) provides belt-and-braces coverage, especially where multiple jurisdictions are involved.

Case Snapshot: Godrich Flour Mills v Swart (1988)

Flemming J’s celebrated “two fishing lines” metaphor still guides courts: a surety links itself to the same line as the debtor; if that line snaps, both fish swim free. A guarantee gives the creditor a second, stronger line – precisely the resilience modern treasury policies demand.

The Strategic Take-Away

For high-value, cross-border, or time-sensitive exposures, guarantees offer creditors:

  •  • Insolvency-remote protection
  •  • Accelerated cash recovery
  •  • Cleaner accounting treatment
  •  • Commercial leverage in pricing and supply chains

In short, a guarantee converts hope of repayment into a legally enforceable certainty – a critical distinction in an era of tight margins and heightened counterparty risk.

Barnard’s Corporate & Commercial team designs bespoke security packages, drafts on-demand guarantees, and stress-tests existing instruments for enforceability in South Africa and abroad. Contact Senior Associate Anneke Lotter for a rapid audit or template upgrade tailored to your risk profile.

Anneke Lötter 3rd July 2025
Share this Article
Facebook LinkedIn Email Copy Link Print
By Anneke Lötter
Senior Associate

Discuss this article with me:

Ad image

You Might Also Like

Who Should Appoint the Conveyancer in a Property Sale?

4 Min Read

PBO? NPO? I don’t know!

6 Min Read

Mango’s Plan: An Investor, a Creditor, and a Cession

7 Min Read

Debt Collection for South Africa’s Booming Car Subscription Sector

5 Min Read
Tree White

© Barnard Inc. All Rights Reserved.

  • Barnard is a Level 2 BEE contributor
  • Privacy Policy
  • Careers
  • Law Students
  • Fidelity Fund Certificates
  • Testimonials
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?